InReview InReview

Support independent journalism


Arts campaigners target Hindmarsh


Artists are campaigning to ensure the hot topic of arts funding is front and centre in the battleground seat of Hindmarsh during the lead-up to the federal election.

Comments Print article

Hindmarsh has been targeted because it is a marginal seat, currently held by Liberal MP Matt Williams after he defeated Labor’s Steve Georganas with a 1.89 per cent margin in 2013.

It is also adjacent to Port Adelaide – home of multi-disciplinary arts company Vitalstatistix, one of five South Australian arts organisations that lost their ongoing federal funding in what has been described as a bloodbath of cuts by the Australia Council earlier this month.

Vitalstatistix creative producer Emma Webb, who is also co-ordinator of the Hindmarsh Campaign Sub-Committee set up by the Arts Industry Council of South Australia, said many of Vitals’ audience members and supporters lived in Hindmarsh.

“What we’re trying to do is highlight the arts as a key issue in that electorate,” she said.

“We feel that it’s an appropriate time to be raising this issue.”

The campaign will focus on the reduction in federal support for national arts funding body the Australia Council. The sub-committee will hold an open meeting at the Mercury Cinema next Tuesday to formulate a campaign action plan, seeking to raise voters’ awareness of the value of the arts in the community and the “massive disruption” – including likely job losses – caused by funding cuts.

However, it is not planning to tell people which candidate to vote for.

“We’re encouraging everyone to look at the arts policies, the track records, and the commitments of all parties standing in the Hindmarsh electorate and elsewhere,” Webb said.

She said that Williams hosted a meeting last year between members of the arts sector and former federal arts minister George Brandis, at which concerns were expressed about cuts to federal funding and Brandis’s establishment of the controversial National Program for Excellence in the Arts (NPEA).

Since then, Brandis has been replaced by Mitch Fifield, some funding has been returned to the Australia Council and the NPEA has been replaced by the new (and still contentious) project funding program Catalyst. But dozens of arts organisations across the country still lost their federal support in the council’s latest four-year funding round.

“I think we all felt at that meeting patronised at best,” Webb said of the 2015 discussion with Brandis.

“Brandis ended the meeting by saying that in a year’s time we would all be feeling quite foolish about our concerns over arts funding – clearly that’s not the case.”

Alongside Vitalstatistix, the other small and medium SA arts organisations that lost out on four-year Australia Council funding were theatre companies Slingsby and Brink Productions, the Contemporary Art Centre of South Australia (CACSA) and Australian Experimental Arts Foundation.

Vitalstatistix, Slingsby and Brink have all launched campaigns seeking donations to help them continue operating and fulfil their production and touring goals.

The Arts Industry Council of SA has also prepared template letters about arts funding which it is encouraging artists and their supporters to send to Minister Fifield and federal representatives.

Make a comment View comment guidelines

Support local arts journalism

Your support will help us continue the important work of InReview in publishing free professional journalism that celebrates, interrogates and amplifies arts and culture in South Australia.

Donate Here


Show comments Hide comments
Will my comment be published? Read the guidelines.

. You are free to republish the text and graphics contained in this article online and in print, on the condition that you follow our republishing guidelines.

You must attribute the author and note prominently that the article was originally published by InReview.  You must also inlude a link to InReview. Please note that images are not generally included in this creative commons licence as in most cases we are not the copyright owner. However, if the image has an InReview photographer credit or is marked as “supplied”, you are free to republish it with the appropriate credits.

We recommend you set the canonical link of this content to to insure that your SEO is not penalised.

Copied to Clipboard

More InReview stories

Loading next article