InReview InReview

Support independent journalism


Light's vision again disappears from view


A painting of Adelaide attributed to Colonel William Light has been bought by a private collector after argument over its authenticity, in a move a prominent art dealer calls a “tragedy for South Australia”.

Print article

Hailed by Elder Fine Arts dealer Jim Elder as a “rare and historic painting”, it was valued at between $90,000 and $120,000, but was passed in at auction on Sunday after a single bid of $20,000 following media reports of an art historian’s doubts about the work.

Elder said today that the painting had since been bought by a private collector for an undisclosed sum, and he was “bitterly disappointed” it had been “lost to South Australian society”.

“This important piece of South Australian history may not be seen again for generations,” he said.

“I am particularly disappointed that a commercial television station last week chose to air an item from an interstate amateur art historian debunking the provenance of this work.”

The unsigned watercolour, said to have been one of the earliest depictions of Adelaide, was found in an old chest at Victor Harbor earlier this year.

The work shows a farmhouse, tents and colonists, with the Mt Lofty Ranges in the background.

Elder said in September that it had been painted by Light in 1837, around the time the Surveyor-General was laying out the state capital.

He said today that “months of painstaking art history and genealogical research” had traced its provenance to a man called Shimmin, who had worked for Light’s surveyor colleague William Jacob in the Barossa Valley, and the painting had remained in the Shimmin family for generations.

Light painted many works and sold some to support himself. But others were lost in an 1839 fire which destroyed his house.

Most surviving works are displayed in the Art Gallery of South Australia, State Library and Town Hall.

Want to comment?

Send us an email, making it clear which story you’re commenting on and including your full name (required for publication) and phone number (only for verification purposes). Please put “Reader views” in the subject.

We’ll publish the best comments in a regular “Reader Views” post. Your comments can be brief, or we can accept up to 350 words, or thereabouts.

InDaily has changed the way we receive comments. Go here for an explanation.

Make a comment View comment guidelines

Support local arts journalism

Your support will help us continue the important work of InReview in publishing free professional journalism that celebrates, interrogates and amplifies arts and culture in South Australia.

Donate Here

. You are free to republish the text and graphics contained in this article online and in print, on the condition that you follow our republishing guidelines.

You must attribute the author and note prominently that the article was originally published by InReview.  You must also inlude a link to InReview. Please note that images are not generally included in this creative commons licence as in most cases we are not the copyright owner. However, if the image has an InReview photographer credit or is marked as “supplied”, you are free to republish it with the appropriate credits.

We recommend you set the canonical link of this content to to insure that your SEO is not penalised.

Copied to Clipboard

More InReview stories

Loading next article