InReview InReview

Support independent journalism


Australia's word of the year speaks up


“Voice” has been named word of the year for 2019.

Print article

It beat shortlisted terms including “climate emergency”, “fish kill”, “influencer” and “quiet Australians” to take out the annual title awarded by the Australian National Dictionary Centre.

The term rose to prominence this year after the Uluru statement called for a “First Nations voice” to be enshrined in the Australian constitution.

Dr Amanda Laugesen, director of the dictionary centre at the Australian National University, said it referred to the need for indigenous Australians to have a formal channel for input.

The centre presents the title to the word or expression they believe best sums up the year.

“We saw ‘voice’ increase considerably in usage though 2019; it was also central to our public debate,” she said.

“The issue was reignited by indigenous affairs minister Ken Wyatt, who proposed a legislated voice to government, prompting heated discussion about what form a voice should take and what it means.

“Professor Marcia Langton has noted this lack of definition in the debate about voice, and called for much more precise language to be used.”

The dictionary centre undertakes research into Australian English and edits Oxford’s Australian dictionaries.

Dr Laugesen said the research found that climate-related terms were also significant in 2019.

“Fish kill was a term we became familiar with after seeing fish die at Menindee Lakes in January,” she said.

“Climate emergency, Oxford dictionaries’ international word of the year, increased considerably in usage in Australia throughout 2019. Both of these made our shortlist.

Macquarie dictionary’s word of the year “cancel culture” was announced last week.

“Cancel culture” refers to the act of boycotting public figures or products when they do or say the wrong thing.


Want to comment?

Send us an email, making it clear which story you’re commenting on and including your full name (required for publication) and phone number (only for verification purposes). Please put “Reader views” in the subject.

We’ll publish the best comments in a regular “Reader Views” post. Your comments can be brief, or we can accept up to 350 words, or thereabouts.

Make a comment View comment guidelines

Support local arts journalism

Your support will help us continue the important work of InReview in publishing free professional journalism that celebrates, interrogates and amplifies arts and culture in South Australia.

Donate Here

. You are free to republish the text and graphics contained in this article online and in print, on the condition that you follow our republishing guidelines.

You must attribute the author and note prominently that the article was originally published by InReview.  You must also inlude a link to InReview. Please note that images are not generally included in this creative commons licence as in most cases we are not the copyright owner. However, if the image has an InReview photographer credit or is marked as “supplied”, you are free to republish it with the appropriate credits.

We recommend you set the canonical link of this content to to insure that your SEO is not penalised.

Copied to Clipboard

More InReview stories

Loading next article