InReview InReview

Support independent journalism


The Perfectionist mines marriage woes


Comments Print article

David Williamson is Australia’s most prolific playwright and his 1982 play The Perfectionist is about a marriage in trouble.

The husband, Stuart (Ross Vosvotekas), is immersed in academic work writing his PhD and – being a perfectionist – is difficult to live with.

His wife, Barbara (Cheryl Douglas), is reading a book about open marriage; she has, understandably, never gotten over the several affairs her husband had early in the marriage.

The couple are spending time in Denmark, where males are much more enlightened than in Australia (where men have been trapped in a chauvinistic time-warp – or so it seemed to Williamson when he wrote the story). When Erik (Chris Knight), a sensitive new-age Danish babysitter, is hired to look after their three sons, Barbara is immediately attracted to him as someone who has a very different persona from her husband.

In Act 2, the chauvinist, self-absorbed Stuart attempts to get in touch with his feminine side, spends less time at work and does more child caring. Meanwhile, Barbara has pursued her PhD studies and feels as though she is losing touch with her sons. The Perfectionist implies that Stuart is at fault by neglecting his family, but the other characters are not blameless: no one is perfect in this play.


Chris Knight, better-known as a local stand-up comedian, is believable as Erik and serves as an example of why film director Joss Whedon places his faith in comedians in dramatic roles – they can be very convincing as serious actors. Kim York effectively portrays Shirley, Stuart’s alcoholic mother, and Rick Mills presents Jack, Stuart’s father, as a pushy, successful barrister who never showed enough affection for his sons.

It is very difficult to maintain a long-term relationship of any kind. The Perfectionist explores the difficulty of balancing a career and individual pursuits while maintaining a home and raising children; this scenario is a juggling act for any couple and strains are placed on relationships, whether they be economic, social or ideological.

After experiencing the “journey” of the two individuals, Williamson’s closing dialogue has the pair agreeing that they can work things out by sharing household duties and being better people. Regardless of its practicality and pragmatism, the resolution seems simplistic, naive and corny.

Director Ross Vosvotekas needs to consider the importance of sound and music in such a show. Just because a play is set in the ’70s doesn’t justify loud, invasive ’70s songs being played before the opening, during scene changes and during a scene. Music can enhance drama and performance, but in this case the choice of soundtrack interferes with the production.

In The Perfectionist, Williamson seems to have created characters who are mouthpieces for ideology rather than real people, so family gatherings become perspectives on pseudo psychology rather than real and raw human interaction. In the interest of “fairness”, characters twist and turn and reverse previously stated positions, but the revelations do not feel illuminating or even plausible. Yet regardless of flaws in the dynamic, Williamson writes good one-liners that have you involuntarily laughing out loud, and there are a number of clever gags in this show.

The performances are generally good, with Douglas and Knight having the most sincere moments, but like the play itself, the portrayals are uneven.

Williamson explores relationships, feminism, parenting, careers, sexual attraction, power and gender equality but, in essence, The Perfectionist is about a marriage breakdown and everyone blaming everyone else for their predicament. There is the potential for Adapt Enterprise’s production to grow during the season and extract even more from the play’s characters and scenarios.

Adapt Enterprises is presenting The Perfectionist at the Bakehouse Theatre until August 8.



Make a comment View comment guidelines

Support local arts journalism

Your support will help us continue the important work of InReview in publishing free professional journalism that celebrates, interrogates and amplifies arts and culture in South Australia.

Donate Here


Show comments Hide comments
Will my comment be published? Read the guidelines.

. You are free to republish the text and graphics contained in this article online and in print, on the condition that you follow our republishing guidelines.

You must attribute the author and note prominently that the article was originally published by InReview.  You must also inlude a link to InReview. Please note that images are not generally included in this creative commons licence as in most cases we are not the copyright owner. However, if the image has an InReview photographer credit or is marked as “supplied”, you are free to republish it with the appropriate credits.

We recommend you set the canonical link of this content to to insure that your SEO is not penalised.

Copied to Clipboard

More Theatre stories

Loading next article